Fall of Ericsson mobile phones - What is Your 100%?


Chapter 3

Earlier this year, my business explorations took me to Stockholm, a city at the forefront of design and innovation, particularly noted for its thriving furniture industry. As the Chief Revenue Officer of a full-service XR agency, my primary goal was to uncover new business opportunities within this creative hub. However, upon landing, a wave of nostalgia hit me as I remembered my first mobile phone—an Ericsson. This unexpected reminiscence steered my thoughts towards understanding what led to the downfall of Ericsson's mobile phone division, a journey that unexpectedly complemented my mission in Stockholm.

Ericsson, once a titan in the mobile phone industry, experienced a significant downturn that led to its exit from the market. At its core, the issue was a profound misunderstanding of customer needs and market trends. This misalignment raises the critical question, "What is your 100%?"—a query that Ericsson might have lost sight of in its strategy and operations.

In Sweden, the story of Ericsson's mobile phones is a tale of innovation, dominance, and an eventual, dramatic shift in strategy that marked the end of an era. From the pioneering days of mobile communication, Ericsson stood as a beacon of technological advancement and a testament to Swedish engineering and design. Yet, the journey from rise to fall, culminating in the joint venture with Sony, encapsulates a series of strategic decisions against the backdrop of an ever-evolving global market.

Ericsson's foray into the mobile phone industry was marked by significant achievements. The company was instrumental in developing the GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) standards, laying the groundwork for the modern mobile communication era. Their phones were renowned for their durability, battery life, and innovative features, securing a loyal customer base and establishing Ericsson as a leading player in the global market.

However, the late 1990s and early 2000s brought formidable challenges. The mobile phone industry was rapidly changing, with consumer preferences shifting towards more user-friendly interfaces and feature-rich devices. Competitors like Nokia and later, emerging smartphone manufacturers, were quick to adapt to these trends, leaving Ericsson struggling to keep pace. The situation was exacerbated by a devastating fire in 2000 at a key supplier's facility, leading to a significant shortage of critical components. This event not only disrupted production but also underscored the vulnerabilities in Ericsson's supply chain and operational resilience.

Facing mounting pressures and a market that was quickly evolving away from its traditional strengths, Ericsson made a strategic pivot in 2001 by entering into a joint venture with Sony. This partnership was intended to combine Ericsson's technical expertise and Sony's prowess in consumer electronics to create a new force in the mobile phone market. Sony Ericsson aimed to capitalize on the growing demand for multimedia capabilities and design innovation, an area where Ericsson had lagged.

Despite initial optimism, the joint venture faced its own set of challenges. The rapidly changing landscape, dominated by the advent of smartphones and the aggressive expansion of competitors, placed significant strain on Sony Ericsson. While the venture produced several successful models and made notable contributions to the mobile phone market, including advancements in camera phone technology, it struggled to achieve a leading position in the smartphone era.

Ultimately, the decision in 2012 for Sony to take over the joint venture and rebrand it under the Sony name marked the end of Ericsson's direct involvement in the mobile phone market. This transition reflected a broader strategic realignment for Ericsson, focusing on its core competencies in telecommunications infrastructure and services.

The story of Ericsson's mobile phones, from its rise as a pioneer in mobile technology to the strategic shift away from consumer handsets, highlights the critical importance of adaptability and foresight in business strategy. The question "What is your 100%?" in this context, reflects the need for companies to continuously evaluate their strengths, market position, and the evolving needs of their customers. For Ericsson, the joint venture was a bold attempt to adapt to a changing market, but it also underscored the challenges of maintaining leadership in an industry defined by rapid technological innovation and shifting consumer preferences.

As we reflect on the lessons from Ericsson's journey, it becomes clear that success in the digital age requires not only innovation and quality but also a keen understanding of market dynamics and the flexibility to pivot strategy when necessary. The rise and fall of Ericsson's mobile phones serve as a poignant reminder of the relentless pace of change in the tech industry and the ongoing quest for relevance and resilience.


What is your 100 % Takeaway

Diversifying Your Supply Chain

One of the biggest takeaways from the story of Ericsson's challenges, especially the impact of the fire at a critical supplier's facility, is the importance of not relying on just one supplier for the crucial components of your product. This lesson is essential for any business, big or small, and here’s some practical advice on how to apply it:

Spread Your Risks

  • Find Multiple Suppliers: Always have more than one source for your key components. This means if one supplier has a problem, you can still get your parts from another. It’s like having a backup plan in case your main plan doesn’t work out.

Build Strong Relationships

  • Partner with Suppliers: Work closely with a few different suppliers to build strong relationships. This way, they understand your business well and can be more reliable partners. It’s like making friends you can count on when things get tough.

Keep Quality Consistent

  • Ensure Quality Across Suppliers: Make sure all your suppliers meet your quality standards. This might mean doing regular checks or helping them get better if they’re not there yet. You want to make sure that no matter where you’re getting your parts from, they’re always good quality.

Plan for Emergencies

  • Have a Backup Plan: Always have a plan for what to do if you suddenly can’t get your components from one or more suppliers. This could mean keeping extra stock on hand or having a quick way to switch to another supplier.

Stay Informed

  • Monitor Your Supply Chain: Keep an eye on what’s happening with your suppliers and the market they’re in. This can help you see problems before they happen and give you time to make changes.

By following this advice, you can make your business more resilient and flexible, just like having multiple paths to reach a destination ensures you’re not stuck if one path is blocked. This strategy not only protects you from unexpected events but also gives you a competitive edge by ensuring your production keeps running smoothly, no matter what happens.

Previous
Previous

Bethlehem Steel's end of a US era - What is your 100%?

Next
Next

Medici Bank's Downfall - What is Your 100%?